Just a note to those who still doubt. I'll try to be as clear as possible:
"OpenD6 will have no approvals. You can put out whatever you want."
"OpenD6 will have no approvals for new developed material. Any new mechanics may be created and submitted to OpenD6 and that material will be posted"
"OpenD6 is have a fan based review ability, that that they can rate and comment on the particular rules submitted." -- This is not an approval. You can submit and publish anything you want, but the fans would have seen and used the material can determine if the rule is broken or not.
And, one more time -- NO APPROVALS!
The license will have a submission requirement for newly developed D6 mechanics only, but that is just so that we can put it up on the site and have it available to the fans. This is obviously separate from any original setting material which is wholly the property of its copyright holder.
I'm not going to use the OGL for a couple reasons, namely the requirement that newly developed open material be submitted to OpenD6 to be downloadable (absent any material that is not open). The other is still the matter on the new GSLs antagonism to material considered OGL. Granted, that clause was made to prevent 3.5 support of 3.5 material and 4 material simultaneously, but it doesn't make that clear.
That said, the OpenD6 license should follow the OGL very closely.